Responding
to Ratings and Reviews
by Maxine Pinson
Innkeepers respond to a lower-than-hoped-for
rating in different ways: disappointment, hurt, anger, or--ideally--a desire
to convert a negative experience into a positive one by gleaning beneficial
information from the critique. Failure to receive a top rating does not
imply one is a failure as an innkeeper or has an inferior inn. Success
becomes a by-product of insufficiency when the acquired knowledge is harnessed
into action.
Whenever your inn undergoes an evaluation, make
sure you understand what standards will be used for the assessment. Do
not hesitate to ask specific questions in advance. If you are uncomfortable
having your inn rated, it is your prerogative to request that it not be
appraised. On the other hand, if you are willing for your inn to be rated
or reviewed, regardless of what the outcome might be, keep the following
points in mind:
-
Guests (and reviewers) expect innkeepers to
be hospitable, an inn to be clean, breakfast to be tasty. Distinctive above-and-beyond
features determine an inn’s degree of superiority over other B & B’s
and result in higher ratings.
-
Ratings by some organizations are meticulously determined
by a comprehensive checklist which appears endless. Other appraisals, especially
independent ones, may be based upon personal preference and criteria.
-
A high rating provides encouragement and satisfaction
for the innkeepers of an inn. However, it has the potential of making one
willing to settle for the status quo and less desirous of striving for
greater heights. A lower rating, accepted with dignity and a positive attitude,
can provide impetus for an innkeeper to create a stellar inn which shines
without a multi-star or diamond rating.
-
If an innkeeper feels his inn has received an unfair
evaluation, he has the right of contacting the reviewer and respectfully
asking for specific reasons why the inn received the rating it did. The
amount of feedback an innkeeper receives will likely be determined by his
approach and attitude. If the appraiser senses the innkeeper is irate or
unreceptive to the reviewer’s feedback, information is usually withheld.
-
The beauty, quality, and superiority of a B &
B rests in the eyes of the beholder. Reviewers and innkeepers may
differ on the meaning of “good taste” or “quality,” concepts defined
by one’s background, personal exposure, and sum total of life’s experiences.
When tastes differ, that does not mean that one person is right and the
other is wrong. It simply indicates a difference of opinion. And there
is certainly nothing wrong with that.
Most importantly, promote only what your inn actually
produces. Beware of using superlatives in your marketing. If you claim,
especially in writing, that your inn has the best “whatever” in the state,
be prepared to back-up your proclamation if questioned. Make sure what
one sees on your inn’s Web site is what one gets when they arrive at your
inn.
An inn does not have to be the best to be good.
Decide which market you wish to target and make every attempt to meet the
needs of the specific guests you are interested in serving. By doing so,
you will be gratified and your guests will be satisfied. In the final analysis,
it is how you and the guests you cater to feel about your inn that really
matters.
Maxine Pinson is publisher/editor of The
INNside Scoop, a bi-annual B & B newsletter. The on-line edition
of the newsletter may be accessed at innsidescoop.com. A resident of Savannah,
Georgia, Maxine may be contacted at innscoop@cs.com
Copyright 2001 by Maxine Pinson
|